#-----------------------------------PLEASE NOTE------------------------------#
# This file is the author's own work and represents their interpretation #
# of the song. The owner of this website has not reviewed the contents of #
# this file. If you feel that the content of this file may be violating #
# copyright law, you may not use the information displayed here in any way. #
#----------------------------------------------------------------------------#
I put 2 ways to play it cuase it took me a while to learn how to move chords pretty
quick, and especially wiht this song. So i put an easy way and a hard way. If you're a
good player then u may be able to afford the skill to play it this way, Make sure you DO
NOT play the strings that are "X"ed or else it sounds WAY off...
Harder, More accurate way
|---x--x--x----x--x--x---x----------------------------|
|---4--x--x----4--x--x---x----------------------------|
|---5--5--7----5--3--4--5-----------------------------|
|---5--6--8----5--5--6--8-----------------------------|
|---3--6--8----3--5--6--8-----------------------------|
|---x--4--6----x--3--4--6-----------------------------|
1 1A 1A 1 1A 1A 2 * SEE BELOW
Easier, More fundamental way (stil sounds good I promise)
|--------------------------------------------------|
|--------------------------------------------------|
|--------------------------------------------------|
|--10---6---8-----10---5---3---6-------------------|
|--10---6---8-----10---5---3---6-------------------|
|---8---4---6------8---3---1---4-------------------|
1 1A 1A 1 1A 1A 2 *SEE BELOW
Strumming Pattern.. Its hard to get at first...but heres how it goes. (d=down strum
strum.... just checking)The strumming pattern kina reminds me of something youd find at
Kentucky Derby.
Brought to you by the GUITARMASTA - http://www.guitarmasta.net
|
No Picture
spence Average |
#1 by spence o'brien at Apr 15, 1971 at 4:25 PM EST |
| I think Reroute To Remain is their best album, with Clayman and COme Clarity, and just because they're changing and are adding more depth doesn't mean that they are "selling Out" | |
|
No Picture
Bert Wanna Be |
#2 by Bert Hastings at Dec 30, 1975 at 1:45 AM EST |
| listening to this and system im starting to get worried about In Flames losing their heaviness edge they've had on the other albums :( theyre one of my fav bands as well. | |
|
No Picture
randy Professional |
#3 by randy taylor at May 18, 1978 at 2:58 PM EST |
| best song | |
|
No Picture
Jake Wanna Be |
#4 by Jake Wilson at Nov 14, 1979 at 12:36 AM EST |
| hey don't say this means they are losing their sound. look back at old in flames. the song timeless on the album Subterranean was a softer song. completely acoustic. even back on Lunar Strain they had some softer shit. Everlost [Part II] is a good example. so i don't think they are getting softer, i think they are difining their sound and staying the same, on almost every album they've had some softer shit. personally i like this newer direction In flames has gone. | |
|
No Picture
william Average |
#5 by william at Aug 24, 1989 at 3:47 PM EST |
| Wow, I ever liked the "softer" sounds of In Flames most! This Song is great! | |
|
No Picture
Ben Wanna Be |
#6 by Ben Koss at Mar 2, 1999 at 11:17 PM EST |
| genetic engineering ...hmmm sounded good at the time | |
|
No Picture
Brennan Wanna Be |
#7 by Brennan unknown at Oct 1, 2005 at 7:26 AM EST |
| A couple slow songs (good ones) doesnt mean there losing there edge. | |