#-----------------------------------PLEASE NOTE------------------------------#
# This file is the author's own work and represents their interpretation #
# of the song. The owner of this website has not reviewed the contents of #
# this file. If you feel that the content of this file may be violating #
# copyright law, you may not use the information displayed here in any way. #
#----------------------------------------------------------------------------#
Pink Floyd - Terminal Frost (Gilmour)
Eb C D/C C
Eb C Dm Bb C F/C C F/C C F/C
C Dm Bb F/C C F/C F/C C F C/E Gm/D F C/E Gm/D D
Eb C Dm Bb C F/C C F/C C F/C
C Dm Bb F/C C F/C F/C C F C/E Gm/D F C/E Gm/D D
Brought to you by the GUITARMASTA - http://www.guitarmasta.net
|
No Picture
Rosa Wanna Be |
#1 by Rosa Beauchamp at Jan 12, 1971 at 3:43 PM EST |
| if you think about it, the songs either side of it could be applied to cryogenics. Terminal Frost | |
|
No Picture
Jimmy Average |
#2 by Jimmy Dresbach at Aug 1, 1971 at 6:27 PM EST |
| Way too 80's industrial sounding for Pink Floyd, but i still like it. | |
|
No Picture
Adam Average |
#3 by Adam Favro at Jan 30, 1973 at 1:54 AM EST |
| Not typical Pink Floyd. But I find it very soothing/relaxing. | |
|
No Picture
David Average |
#4 by David Turner at May 27, 1974 at 8:48 PM EST |
| Really ethereal and uplifting sound, especially in the middle part; the sax kinda sound like '90's elevator music, maybe? I don't know I don't listen to much in the way of elevator music. But all that aside, doesn't the piece as a whole sound sort of "porny?" I just had visions throughout the song of a really bad, cheesy '70's porno flick. What do you think? | |
|
No Picture
chris Wanna Be |
#5 by chris calle at Mar 17, 1982 at 9:48 PM EST |
| I don't get it. I don't understand this song. | |
|
No Picture
bec Average |
#6 by bec madden at May 31, 1983 at 4:15 AM EST |
| it's all in the name: terminal frost. the word terminal means the end of something, and the word frost is associated with cold. now, the coldness that could be referenced to in the song could refer to one's attitude toward the world/life.... so what it now means is the end of the cold / feelings of death. stop looking at the music and its aural aesthetics, instead look at the movement, as in a picture. the song clearly displays something that begins depressing, slow, cold, deathlike, then moves on to the climax which is the sax part, signifying a release from the cold. -shas | |
|
No Picture
Zach Average |
#7 by Zach at Mar 28, 1989 at 5:07 PM EST |
| Does anyone seem to notice that every Pink Floyd instrumental has to have something spoken in the background? The only thing I could make out on this one is: "Never again!" | |
|
No Picture
Sam Wanna Be |
#8 by Sam Payne at May 12, 1991 at 5:13 PM EST |
| Great instrumental though. Interesting guitar work in it. | |
|
No Picture
Max Average |
#9 by Max Benton at Jan 15, 1999 at 10:42 AM EST |
| Oh my bog the saxophone bit in this one is absolutely the *cheesiest* pos I've heard from these lads. | |
|
No Picture
Grunge Hamster Lead Player |
#10 by Grunge Hamster at Aug 30, 1999 at 1:22 AM EST |
| It's about one step freeze off wart removers that hadn't been invented at the time. | |
|
No Picture
Zach Wanna Be |
#11 by Zach Honeycutt at May 20, 2002 at 7:03 AM EST |
| It really kind of scares the shit out of me though. | |
|
No Picture
bobby Rhythm Player |
#12 by bobby volm at Dec 5, 2002 at 7:08 AM EST |
| Or was it "Ever again!"? | |